Our recommendations are made independently. We may receive commissions from purchases made via our links.
Waterdrop WD-FC-01 vs PUR Faucet (FM2500V) Side-by-Side Comparison
Overall Verdict
Much like the PUR Plus PFM3500V, the PUR FM2500V has a beautiful design made from plastic. It’s sleek and looks very nice when mounted on the faucet. This, combined with its great filtering performance, explains its popularity among consuemrs on the market.
Its sole issue is that it has a very low flow rate at 0.3 GPM. It’s a problem that it shares with its sibling, the PUR Plus PFM3500V.
The Watedrop WD-FC-01, on the other hand, while being at a fraction of the price, offers significantly better performance. In our chlorine test, the WD-FC-01 also attained a perfect score. And in terms of flow rate, it’s one of the fastest models that we have on hand at 1.29 GPM.
Although its design isn’t quite as luxurious as the PUR FM2500V, it still looks pretty decent with its sleek and compact housing.
All in all, if you’re looking for value, the Waterdrop WD-FC-01 presents a much better offer than the PUR FM2500V.
Pros & Cons
- Excellent chlorine filtration efficiency.
- High filtering flow rate.
- Unique design and installation system.
- Replacement filter is readily available.
- Excellent chlorine filtering ability
- Easy installation and servicing with "one-click" system
- Lightweight and compact design
- A filter change indicator
- While unique, the installation system of the filter is hard to figure out.
- Plastic construction makes long-term durability a concern.
- Low flow rate in filtering mode
- Weak grip on faucet due to the one-click system
- Flimsy routing valve’s handle
- The plastic construction can be problematic for long-term durability
Key Specs
Where to Buy
*You help support Shouldit's product testing and reviews by purchasing from our retail partners.