Our recommendations are made independently. We may receive commissions from purchases made via our links.
Chefman Cordless vs Betty Crocker Hand Blender Side-by-Side Comparison
Overall Verdict
The Betty Crocker Hand Blender may sound like a lot of fun, but its performance cannot measure up to the KitchenAid Cordless. They do equally well with hot soup purees, smooth enough with a few rougher bits here and there. However, the Betty Corcker is dismal at frozen smoothies, mediocre at best with mayonnaise and almond milk, while the Chefman is easily competitive in the top range for these. Neither do whipped egg whites because neither have a whisk.
In terms of accessories, the Betty Crocker at least has a nice beaker, while the Chefman compensates with a blade guard for when out of use. Unfortunately, the Betty Crocker does ot have the most robust construction, the shaft is weak and prone to break easily, and the blades tend to be quite susceptible to rust. The grip is poor, the buttons stiff, and it vibrates excessively. As one can tell, there is not much advantage to even considering the Betty Crocker as an alternative to the Chefman, or any other blender.
Pros & Cons
- The lock function helps prevent accidental operation, reducing the likelihood of personal injury.
- It feels like a fancy blender.
- Multiple speed options allow for a wide range of tasks.
- It is capable of pulverizing frozen fruit and making mayonnaise.
- Colored LED ring indicates the battery’s status accurately.
- All the buttons are easy to control.
- An included cookware guard keeps pots and pans scratch-free.
- Adequate for light task
- Simple design
- It is unable to whip eggs due to the lack of a whisk attachment
- Flimsy construction
- Lackluster heavy blending performance
- Lack of user-friendly features
Key Specs
Where to Buy
*You help support Shouldit's product testing and reviews by purchasing from our retail partners.